UPDATED American Market for Wine - OIV Day 2

Posted on Tuesday 11 July 2006

Overall another good day, reinforcing the initial talk given by Vic on Monday. Today was really a hodgepodge of stats and opinions focusing on the US market, and there was quite a bit of overlap in the presentations. There were a few pretty cool data tidbits from each presenter, and I’ve noted them below after a quick synopsis of each’s talk. (I’ve given up on live blogging, without even really trying it. All the cool kids do nightly summaries anyway ;) )

The American Wine Consumer

Christian Miller, Owner, Full Glass Research

Synopsis: Wine consumers can be broken out into Occasional, Core, Bag-in-box and Aficionado categories based on price and frequency of consumption. Core buyers are where the action is, they are typically either Boomers or Millennials, and have high education and high income. Culture is also a big factor in what creates a core wine drinker. Influences include the gourmet revolution (higher priced, more intensely flavored and diverse foods) the luxury revolution, and “the key experience” (a memorable visit to the wine country or an extraordinary dinner of which wine was big part).

Take away: The key to growth is to grow the Core consumer segment.

Interesting tidbit (from some survey data on tasting room preferences Christian shared): 99% of people surveyed think it is very or somewhat important to be able to taste older or small production wines unavailable through retailers or restaurants. All those surveyed want to also be able to taste all new releases. 87% think it is important to be able to learn more about the wines and how the wines were produced, and 64% think it is important to be able to purchase large format bottles. However, only 25% think it is important to be able to buy wine related merchandise or winery branded clothing. In tasting rooms it’s all about the wine.

Wine Sales Trends in the US

Barbara Insel, Managing Director, MKF Research

Synopsis: There is consolidation in both wineries and in distribution as well as changing consumer behavior preferences. Consumers are moving up market in all consumption and they are demanding both premium quality and value. The strongest growth continues in the high end. Importantly (and this will sound familiar to Cluetrain kool aid drinkers - and I’m one of ‘em) consumers are seeking authenticity and experiences. They distrust advertising and conventional marketing noise. The implications for winery strategy are:

  • Know your consumer’s lifestyle and preferences (mailing list segmentation)
  • Understand the importance of word of mouth
  • Have a coherent, distinctive and authentic (her emphasis) message.

Take away: Know your customer and build a real relationship with them.

Interesting tidbit: The growth of demand for high end wines has far outpaced the growth of the appropriate grape production. See graph, and feel the pinot love.

Expanding the Market

John Gillespie, Executive Director, The Wine Market Council

Synopsis: John’s talk was the highlight of the day. The US wine market is a large one, encompassing over 3700 wineries with 260 million cases of wine produced per year at a retail value of 25 billion dollars. Table wine consumption has increased every year since 1994, the longest sustained period of growth yet. John goes on to describe the Core/Marginal wine drinker segments already covered above, but John added a bunch of interesting data on their attitudes. Since the industry’s main goal should be to turn Marginals into Cores, the results are important. Here are some of his findings.

Both Core and Marginal wine drinkers think wine makes a good gift (something Paul at Inertia has been way out in front of - check out his comments here on the subject), that moderate use is good for you and that you can buy good wine without spending a lot. Where they differ is:

  • Over the need to have a bottle on hand (89 Core to 67 Marginal).
  • On whether an open bottle stays fresh for 2-3 days (62-50)
  • Marginals don’t like the idea of opening a whole bottle of wine all to themselves, Cores don;t have as much of a problem (40% of cores don’t like to open vs. 59% of marginals).
  • Marginals are more likely than Cores to think that wine is too complicated (15-26), but both groups are fairly comfortable buying wine.

Take away: See below

Interesting tidbit: John made the point that Marginals and Cores each buy wines at all price points (including the very high end), it is just that Marginals buy wine with much less frequency (less than once a week vs more than once a week). If the wine industry or some cultural event can tip those who are currently Marginals just one category over into twice a week drinkers, the industry would grow enormously.

One of the obvious areas to attack to bring about that change is the “bottle staying fresh” issue since it directly influences whether someone will open a bottle of wine when they are alone. John related that experiments have shown conclusively that consumers prefer wine that has been opened for three days better than two days, and wine open two days better than one day. It would be a good idea to get the message out there that wine can not only keep for more than one night, but that its taste will probably even improve.

Anyone want to do a blog post on that?


2 Comments for 'UPDATED American Market for Wine - OIV Day 2'

  1.  
    July 13, 2006 | 9:25 pm
     

    [...] Josh over at PinotBlogger (who still has my link spelled wrong, but that’s okay because I’m happy to have the link in the first place) lists this concept as a key takeaway from a talk at UC Davis.  “Know your customer and build a real relationship with them.”  I think that’s dead on.  I know I’m a lot more likely to buy wine from a friendly, outgoing winemaker who does things right in the vineyard and in the tasting room.  I’m far less likely to keep buying wine, even if it’s good wine, from a total jerk who acts like his or her wine is superior, worth the extra $50/bottle because of what’s written on the label, etc., etc.  No thanks! [...]

  2.  
    Stefano
    April 24, 2007 | 9:23 am
     

    While the idea that wines stays fresh for three days is great for the industry and does make people more want to open wines, I think that the above statements are a little too enthusiastic. If a marginal wine drinker opens a light white like a dry reisling and doesn’t refrigerate it or if they open a lighter red like beajolais nouveau or a dolcetto they might be more turned off by the whole wine experience if they expect all wines to be as good or better the second day. This is especially true for a lot of California wines that are very friendly in the beginning but then lead to a dissapointing and flimsy end.

    I guess I would say….don’t be afraid to try wines the second day, there is a chance that the wines might be better. It might not, but, to me, it is those types of chances that makes drinking wine so fun.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Please consider what you're posting.

Use the buttons below to customise your comment.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI