<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veraison Is Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/</link>
	<description>A blog about starting and building a family winery in the Russian River Valley</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Ahh, random sampling would be too hard in this case...perhaps you could get the same 67 people drunk first?  You'd get some random results then!  *)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, random sampling would be too hard in this case&#8230;perhaps you could get the same 67 people drunk first?  You&#8217;d get some random results then!  *)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>Alex,

You\'re right, assuming that my sample is truly random. Unfortunately my sample is almost assuredly NOT random. Good enough for me though.

We\'re up to 67 now and the percentages aren\'t changing too much: 21 is up to 37.3%.

If the relative percentages hold up though I\'m more than willing to act on them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>You\&#8217;re right, assuming that my sample is truly random. Unfortunately my sample is almost assuredly NOT random. Good enough for me though.</p>
<p>We\&#8217;re up to 67 now and the percentages aren\&#8217;t changing too much: 21 is up to 37.3%.</p>
<p>If the relative percentages hold up though I\&#8217;m more than willing to act on them. <img src='http://www.pinotblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>So, is it 11 people each for labels 23 and 76, 12 people for label 32, and 17 people for label 21?  That's actually a pretty good turnout, I'd say!  And, 50 people is enough for a legitimate sample size...although I doubt there's a significant difference in preference between 21 and the other labels.  *)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is it 11 people each for labels 23 and 76, 12 people for label 32, and 17 people for label 21?  That&#8217;s actually a pretty good turnout, I&#8217;d say!  And, 50 people is enough for a legitimate sample size&#8230;although I doubt there&#8217;s a significant difference in preference between 21 and the other labels.  *)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
